August 2013 Archives

| No Comments

By Jeffrey T. Zaino, Esq.

The American Arbitration Association (AAA) launched a new comprehensive online resource for all aspects of mediation, built by mediators for mediators and those who need mediators. The site is and it is much more than a website, it's a community for mediators that is open to everyone in the alternative dispute resolution community.

Individuals, governmental agencies, and companies seeking qualified mediators with a searchable database of highly skilled mediators with expertise in diverse fields, mediation case-management and mediation case-management tools; and online dispute resolution. Also, practicing mediators now have the opportunity to publish their resumes in the searchable online mediator database alongside AAA® panel mediators; practice tips and tools; professional development resources; and education and training.


The Mediator Search engine at helps individuals and organizations find the right mediator for a case and location. Detailed, customized mediator searches can be conducted focusing on several areas of expertise, including disputes arising in the commercial, community, construction, employment, environmental, family, governmental, healthcare, insurance, international, judicial settlement, labor, and mass claims arenas. helps practicing mediators to market and grow their mediation practices through publication of their detailed mediator resume in the robust directory of mediators, along with some of the most accomplished neutrals in the industry.


Disputes that parties consider to be fairly straightforward can be filed online for greater speed, efficiency and a much lower cost. To utilize the online services, there must be only two parties, with neither claim nor any counterclaim valued at greater than $10,000.

The entire mediation process is conducted online by a trained Staff Mediator who handles the matter from start to finish, with no telephone sessions or face-to-face meetings.

MEDIATION SERVICES helps identify the mediation service that best meets a specific mediation need:

Technical support and customized programs to resolve high-volume, large-scale caseloads for disaster recovery, mortgage foreclosure, and similar mass claims.

Innovative and cutting-edge mediation services to meet unique conflict-management needs,such as residential mortgage mediation for the Florida Foreclosure program and Judicial Settlement Conference Services, which utilizes neutrals selected from a panel of former judges with especially strong settlement skills.

NEWS+OPINION strives to equip the global mediation community and its various stakeholders with knowledge to achieve further mediation success through current articles and news releases and national user group dialogues. Users can get recognized for contributions to the field through their literary submissions.

FOR MEDIATORS is a community of colleagues for mediators -- their club, their library, their forum. On, mediators can:

• Make their resumes available for selection by parties. • Get access to "tools of the trade" (rules, standards of conduct, statutes by state). • Find trade and academic organizations for continuing education and/or membership. • Publish their original articles.

Visit, click on the Join tab, follow the prompts and enter the required data; upon completion you will receive email confirmation of your subscription and information on publishing your resume.

Jeffrey T. Zaino, Esq., is Vice President for the Labor, Employment and Elections Division of the American Arbitration Association in New York.

By Gerald M. Levine

Over the past few years there has been increased economic pressure on disputants to explore alternatives to court litigation and a corresponding increase in taking advantage of the more cost-efficient processes offered in commercial arbitrations/mediations. Counsel representing clients in these ADRs now have the means of protecting their fees in these proceedings through a charging lien due to a recent amendment to Judiciary Law §§ 475 and 475-a. Prior to this amendment, charging liens were only available where a court proceeding had been commenced. To the New York City Bar, which proposed the amendment in 2008, it made no sense that the "fruits of productive attorney labor should [not be protected by a charging] lien - even absent the commencement of a court proceeding." (Our section endorsed the amendment.) In the New York State Senate Introducer's Memorandum in Support of a bill to amend sections 475 and 475-a, Senator Sampson stated that "[t]he practice of law has changed tremendously since Section 475 was last revised in 1946 and Section 475-a was adopted in 1955." The Senator went on to explain that "[a]lternative dispute resolution also benefits the court system by taking disputes that are ripe for resolution out of the often overtaxed courts."

Before the amendment, counsel in arbitration and mediation were at a disadvantage in securing their fees. In re Taylor, Jacoby & Campo, 208 A.D.2d 400, 401 (1st Dept. 1994); In re Matter of Weldon v. De Martini, 231 N.Y.S.2d 530, 533 (Queens Cty 1962) ("The action or proceeding must have actually been commenced and the attorney seeking to enforce the lien must have appeared in the action or proceeding as attorney of record.") If the only appearance was to confirm or vacate the award only that portion of counsel's fee could be charged as a lien. The only way of protecting against "the knavery of his client" [In re City of New York, 5 N.Y.2d 300, 307 (1959)] was to commence a lawsuit or (less expensively) a mediation or arbitration under Part 137 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Court (limited to fees under $50,000 unless otherwise agreed to by the client). At one time the predecessor statute to CPLR 7502, section 1459 of the Civil Practice Act classified arbitration as a special proceeding, but the successor statute "omitted any such reference and instead sought to avoid imposing the formality of a judicial proceeding upon arbitration until the first application is made to a court." Spinello v. Spinello, 70 Misc.2d 521, 525, 334 N.Y.S.2d 70 (NY Sup. 1972). Dropping reference to a "special proceeding" had the unintended result of making it more difficult for an attorney to protect the "fruit of [his or her] productive ... labor," which the Legislature has now corrected.

The amendments which became law on January 1, 2013 (effective January 19, 2013) expand coverage - from "the commencement of an action, special or other proceeding in any court" - to include mediation, arbitration and settlement negotiations. Post January 19, 2013, counsel has the right to a charging lien. In the amendments, the Legislature made two additions Section 475. The first which is substantive, adds the words "commencement of an action..." following "or the initiation of any means of alternative dispute resolution including, but not limited to, mediation or arbitration, or the provision of services in a settlement negotiation at any stage of the dispute, the attorney who appears for a party has a lien upon his or her client's cause of action, claim or counterclaim." The second addition is more in the nature of correcting male gender specific grammatical usage by adding the pronoun "her" so that the law now reads that counsel has a right to a charging lien "upon his or her client's cause of action, claim or counterclaim." In fairly recent history, "his" was regarded as gender neutral. This change was Legislature driven and was not part of the proposal made by the bar associations.

One of the first questions raised under the new law was whether the amendment was retrospective or prospective. In a recent decision, Justice Louis York held that law is prospective. In Bonnaig v. Walton, 110429/11 (NY Sup. 6-3-13), he stated:

"In the amendment at hand, there is no express discussion of the issue of retroactivity. However, the amendment does state that "[t]his act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law." NY Jud. Law. Section 475. A postponement of the effective date of a statute is strong evidence that the Legislature did not intend for it to be retroactive."
Justice York rejected the plaintiff's argument that the law "should apply retroactively to lien cases which currently are pending in the Court system." The plaintiff had represented a client in an EEOC proceeding that was concluded before the enactment of the Section 475 amendment. "Had the amendment occurred prior to the commencement of the EEOC mediation, Plaintiff undisputedly could have enforced a charging lien," the Court added.

Gerald M. Levine is a member of Levine Samuel, LLP. He practices in New York City and is on the list of neutrals of the American Arbitration Association. Mr. Levine runs an ADR blog on domain names and cybersquatting at

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from August 2013 listed from newest to oldest.

July 2013 is the previous archive.

September 2013 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Powered by Movable Type 5.11