« Other New York State Bar Association Weblogs | Main | Driving to Hershey Park? Customize Your Own Route with Google Maps »

Objection During Summations?

I haven't seen a lot of decisions like the Appellate Division, First Department's decision in Binder v. Miller. The case concerned a dental malpractice action, and during summations the plaintiff's attorney called the defendant's expert witness a litigation witness. The defendant's attorney preserved the objection for appellate review but was restricted from objecting during the summation of the plaintiff's attorney. The Court held that the remark was better left unsaid but did not warrant a new trial.

The takeaway point of the case is that the Court reminded the Supreme Court Justice that directing counsel that "there is to be no objecting in the middle of summations," is inappropriate.

Attorneys have their own rules about objecting during openings and closings (always with an eye toward not looking obstructive in front of the jury). This case provides a good lesson for attorneys to keep their wits about them when a judge does something that warrants appellate review, making sure to do something to preserve the issue for appellate review.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on May 12, 2007 11:39 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Other New York State Bar Association Weblogs.

The next post in this blog is Driving to Hershey Park? Customize Your Own Route with Google Maps.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.