New York State is looking for more revenue and one of its new tools is increased penalties for tax cheats. Do you think the new laws will be effective in achieving that goal?
« October Poll Question | Main | Did the Odds Change? »
New York State is looking for more revenue and one of its new tools is increased penalties for tax cheats. Do you think the new laws will be effective in achieving that goal?
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 20, 2009 12:47 PM.
The previous post in this blog was October Poll Question.
The next post in this blog is Did the Odds Change?.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (3)
While "tax cheats" is a flexible, even amorphous term, I submit that the legal tax avoidance schemes provided by our Byzantine tax code cost government far more than criminal activity, and a flurry of prosecutions headlined in the penny press will do no more than distract the public from this fact. If you want to see a bunch of politicians scurry for cover, just mention the benefits of a flat tax.
Posted by Barry E Lerner | November 30, 2009 9:26 PM
Posted on November 30, 2009 21:26
Unfortunately, I am cynical in that I don't believe increasing the penalties for tax cheats would be effective, in practice, to raise revenue. In my opinion, it seems that the major tax cheats are now deeply entrenched in the government, either as lobbyists or as government employees; and it appears quite evident that government law makers turn a blind eye when enforcing rules against themselves. Perhaps a better method of raising revenue is to simply cut spending; a novel concept indeed for most government bureaucrats!
Posted by Louis | December 1, 2009 12:06 AM
Posted on December 1, 2009 00:06
New York would be better declaring a tax amnesty. This might get inviduals and businesses who have not filed returns to file their returns. Once these people and businesses have filed and paid their back taxes, they might be more inclined to file and pay in the future.
Posted by Fred Hirsh | December 1, 2009 7:43 AM
Posted on December 1, 2009 07:43