Lawyer Appearing Pro Se on Tax Matter Denied Attorney's Fee as Prevailing Party

| No Comments

DOJ v. Hudson, 09-3600-bk

Finding no reason to depart from our reasoning in Pietrangelo or Hawkins, and joining our sister Circuits that have considered this provision of the IRC, see McCormack v. United States, 891 F.2d 24, 25 (1st Cir. 1989) and United States v. McPherson, 840 F.2d 244, 245 (4th Cir. 1988), we hold that lawyers appearing pro se who prevail in administrative or court proceedings against the United States are ineligible for attorneys' fees under IRC ァ7430.

DOJ v. Hudson, 09-3600-bk (full text)

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Leonard E. Sienko, Jr. published on November 16, 2010 12:16 PM.

MarkUp was the previous entry in this blog.

NYLJ: The Right to One Phone Call - But No Tweets is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 5.11