May federal judges be members of the ABA or the Federalist Society? Draft ethics opinion says yes and no--ABA Journal

| No Comments
BY DEBRA CASSENS WEISS

***

A draft ethics opinion advises that federal judges should not be members of the conservative Federalist Society and the liberal American Constitution Society because the affiliation raises questions about their impartiality.

But membership in the ABA's Judicial Division "does not raise these same concerns and is not necessarily inconsistent" with the conduct code covering federal judges, the draft advisory ethics opinion says.

The draft opinion adds that judges should "carefully monitor" ABA activities to make sure their membership remains consistent with the conduct code. Judges should also consider whether a position taken by the ABA might require recusal in particular matters, the draft opinion says.

The draft opinion was posted by the National Review and covered by Law360. The opinion was drafted by the Committee on Codes of Conduct of the U.S. Judicial Conference and circulated to federal judges for review and comment.


***

Read more...

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Leonard E. Sienko, Jr. published on January 24, 2020 2:40 PM.

Sui Generis--a New York law blog: ABA Report: 2020 Legal Research Trends was the previous entry in this blog.

American Doctors Are Treating a Coronavirus Patient With a Robot--Futurism--Neoscope is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 5.11