Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2012 contains the Budget Message of the President, information on the President's priorities, budget overviews organized by agency, and summary tables.
To download "Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2012" as a single PDF click here(216 pages, 4.1 MB)
Despite the rather sensationalized news reports about a "Doomsday manual", this new resource/reference will be of use to local health officials as well as municipal attorneys throughout the state. Click here for pdf version.
This handbook presents safety information for public play- ground equipment in the form of guidelines. Publication of this handbook is expected to promote greater safety aware- ness among those who purchase, install, and maintain public playground equipment. Because many factors may affect playground safety, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) staff believes that guidelines, rather than a mandatory rule, are appropriate. These guidelines are not being issued as the sole method to minimize injuries associated with playground equipment. However, the Commission believes that the recommendations in this handbook along with the technical information in the ASTM standards for public playgrounds will contribute to greater playground safety.
Pocket Guide for Federal Judges Discusses Sealed Cases
A recently published pocket guide for federal judges focuses on the occasional need to seal court records and proceedings.
Published by the Federal Judicial Center, the 22-page pocket guide draws on the voluminous case law to discuss the process courts use to keep some of the proceedings and records confidential.
The guide states: "Essential to the rule of law is the public performance of the judicial function. On occasion, however, there are good reasons for courts to keep parts of some proceedings confidential . . . Usually that means that any transcript made of the proceeding will be regarded as a sealed record."
The guide (pdf) offers a procedural checklist of considerations when a record is sealed or when a proceeding is closed to the public.
Ex Parte temporary restraining order. Resp. shall open the Wisconsin Capitol to members of the public during business hours and at times when governmental matters, such as hearings, listening sessions and court arguments are being conducted. This ex parte restraing order is in effect until the assigned trial court is able to schedule a hearing on the matter. If resp. wishes to have a hearing with respect to this order one will be scheduled as soon as possible before this court, the duty judge, if the assigned trial court is unable to hear the matter promptly. Pet. shall immediately serve a copy of this order on resp.
New York's continuing foreclosure crisis and the need to help homeowners avoid the loss of their homes
Prepared by Barbara van Kerkhove, Ph.D. March 9, 2011
The report, which includes maps of several upstate regions, shows that in September, 2010 in all but one of New York's 62 counties, more loans are at imminent risk of foreclosure than are currently in foreclosure. The report calls for $15 million for the continuation of the Foreclosure Prevention Services Program.
To download a copy of the report , click on the report thumbnail included in this email or visit our website to view the report and press release.
Install the IRS Calendar Connector and access Important Tax Dates for Small Businesses right from your desktop, even when you're offline. As new events are added, they will be automatically updated via the desktop tool.
This customizable tool allows you to specify what types of events you wish to view (general, employer, excise, or all) and how you want them displayed (by day, week or month).
The IRS Calendar Connector requires Adobe® AIR®. Follow these steps to install it on your computer:
First, click on the "Get ADOBE® AIR®" button.
When the AIR® installation is complete, click this button to install the IRS Calendar Connector.
Your iPad 2 is so close, you can almost hear the click of your new Smart Cover snapping into place. But if you already own the original iPad, you should take time now to prepare your migration from that device to the iPad 2. With advanced planning, you'll be ready to start playing with your new tablet practically from the moment you open up the box.
Epocrates is a leading provider of clinical solutions to healthcare professionals and interactive services to the healthcare industry.
Most commonly used on mobile devices at the point of care, their products help healthcare professionals make more informed prescribing decisions, enhance patient safety and improve practice productivity. Their user network consists of over one million healthcare professionals, including over 300,000, or over 45% of, U.S. physicians.
Their free products, including apps for all major smart phones, are very useful for health care professionals, consumers, and lawyers who deal with both groups:
If you are a fully certified or approved foster parent and a relative has been placed with you as a foster child for six months or more, you may be eligible for the Kinship Guardianship Assistance Program (KinGAP). KinGAP is designed to support permanent placements for foster children with relatives to whom they are related by either blood, marriage, or adoption. This program provides financial support and, in most cases, medical coverage for the child. The financial support is similar to the foster care maintenance payments you receive as a foster parent.
Included with this booklet are two attachments to review with your caseworker when exploring your permanency options.
"Factors for Related Foster Parents to Consider When Reviewing Permanency Options" (page 12) will help you and your caseworker determine the best permanency option for the child and your family. "New York State's Permanency Comparison Chart" (page 13) compares kinship guardianship assistance, adoption assistance, and foster care.
The Free Law Reporter™ is where free law meets accessibility. It's an electronic case reporter that freely publishes nearly every recent appellate and supreme court opinion, from state to federal US courts. FLR uses the RECOP project as a starting point, making its opinions searchable online and available as ebook collections, with more features in development.
The goal of FLR is to develop a freely available, unencumbered law reporter that is capable of serving as a resource for education, research, and practice. The first step is to use FLR to provide greater access through enhanced and alternate formats of the weekly feeds coming from RECOP.
The weekly feeds provided by RECOP are a new source of court opinions from across the country with each weekly feed containing all slip and final opinions primarily from the appellate courts of the 50 states and the federal government released under a Creative Commons Zero License packaged as XML files in a single weekly archive.
Each weekly feed contains 2 groupings of opinions: slip opinions and paginated cases. The slip opinions are individual documents that come directly from the court, are paginated by the court, and contain little or no citation information. The paginated cases are individual documents that have been added to the West reporter system, contain West pagination and full West citations.
CALI's FLR project is processing the slip opinion portion of the archives to create a body of court opinions that is accessible to anyone including educators, librarians, students, lawyers and the public. The raw XML of the archives is processed into valid XHTML and some meta data is added to facilitate the indexing and classification of the documents. The XHTML files are saved into a web folder structure organized by weekly RECOP volume and jurisdiction for viewing with a web browser. The XHTML files are fed into a search engine powered by Apache Solr allowing for sophisticated searching and analysis of the documents. Finally the weekly volumes are gathered by state and federal jurisdiction into ebooks in the .epub format viewable on virtually any desktop, laptop, tablet, smartphone and e-reader device. All of this available now at www.freelawreporter.org. The FLR website is updated weekly as new RECOP archives are released.
U.S. Courts News: New Pilot Project Will Enhance Public Access to Federal Court Opinions
A dozen federal courts have been selected to participate in a pilot program in which the federal judiciary and theGovernment Printing Office are partnering to provide free public access to court opinions through the GPO's FDSys system.
The one-year pilot project was approved by the Judicial Conference in March 2010, and the GPO received approval from the Joint Committee on Printing - often referred to as the oldest joint committee of the Congress - in February 2011.
When fully implemented later this year, the pilot will include two courts of appeals, seven district courts, and three bankruptcy courts. In March, the Judicial Conference approved expansion of the pilot to include up to 30 additional courts.
The judiciary continually has sought ways to enhance public access to court opinions. Free access to opinions in all federal courts is currently available via the judiciary's Public Access to Court Electronic Records service (PACER).
Building on that success, staff from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts met with GPO management to explore making opinions even more accessible. Fdsys can provide the public with a robust search engine that can search common threads across opinions and courts.
The initial 12 participating courts are the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and Eighth Circuits; the U.S. district courts for the Districts of Minnesota, Rhode Island, Maryland, Idaho, and Kansas, the Northern District of New York, and the Northern District of Alabama; and the U.S. bankruptcy courts for the District of Maine, the Southern District of Florida, and the Southern District of New York.
At present, the site has daily information regarding all precedential opinions issued by the 13 federal circuit courts and the Supreme Court of the United States. Each day, they also have the non-precedential opinions from all of the Circuit courts except the D.C. Circuit. This means that by 5:10pm PST, the database will be updated with the opinions of the day, with custom alerts going out shortly thereafter.
The coverage of their corpus for a given court varies, but it is growing on a daily basis. They are working to integrate the documents from other online sites that provide free public access to court documents.
To see a detailed overview of their corpus (updated daily), visit their coverage page
Teaching with primary documents encourages a varied learning environment for teachers and students alike. Lectures, demonstrations, analysis of documents, independent research, and group work become a gateway for research with historical records in ways that sharpen students' skills and enthusiasm for history, social studies, and the humanities.
A.G. SCHNEIDERMAN TO SUE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TODAY FOR FAILURE TO STUDY "FRACKING"
A.G. SCHNEIDERMAN TO SUE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TODAY FOR FAILURE TO STUDY "FRACKING"
Demand For Fracking Study In Delaware River Basin Ignored - Even Though Drilling Would Affect NY Watershed And Portions Of 8 New York Counties
Feds Abandon Legally Required Responsibility To Assess Environmental & Public Health Impacts Of Natural Gas Drilling
Schneiderman: Feds Have An Obligation To Protect Public Health & Safety - We Will Force Them To Do So...
The Cyberlaw Clinic provides high-quality, pro-bono legal services to appropriate individuals, small start-ups, non-profit groups and government entities regarding cutting-edge issues of the Internet, new technology and intellectual property. Harvard Law School students enhance their preparation for high-tech practice and earn course credit for working on a variety of real-world litigation, client counseling, advocacy, legislation, and transactional/licensing projects and cases.
The Berkman Center's Interactive collection features conversations with and talks by leading cyber-scholars, entrepreneurs, activists, and policymakers as they explore topics such as: the factors that influence knowledge creation and dissemination in the digital age; the character of power as the worlds of governance, business, citizenship, and the media meet the Internet; and the opportunities, role, and limitations of new technologies in learning.
All Berkman events, including conferences, luncheon series talks, and most meetings, are webcast then archived here, along with unique productions like the Citizen Media Law Project podcast and episodes of Berkman.tv. A selection of the archive is also available on Berkman's YouTube channel.
"it is not reasonable to presume that a judge is incapable of making an impartial decision about the constitutionality of a law, solely because, as a citizen, the judge could be affected by the proceedings."
The DEC made various documents available on July 1, 2011, including an Executive Summary of the revised draft GEIS. The full revised draft of the GEIS was made available yesterday. The documents now available include: atime lineregarding the GEIS, afact sheet regarding what DEC believes it has learned from Pennsylvania's experiences with hydraulic fracturing, apress release regarding the DEC's recommendations, a list of the members of a newHydraulic Fracturing Advisory Panel, aPowerPoint presentation from DEC's July 1, 2011 press conference, a simplediagramshowing how an intermediate casing would help protect ground water, and the full draft GEIS, which can be download in itsentiretyor in portions from aweb page that allows downloads by individual sectionsof the GEIS. Avideo of the DEC's July 1, 2011 press conference regarding its recommendations also is available.
For timely natural gas legal info, ADD THIS BLOG to your feeds or subscribe by email.
New York State Humane Association's manual, "How to Investigate Animal Cruelty in New York State - A Manual of Procedures" is a comprehensive document which includes chapters on how to be prepared ahead of time - before you actually receive a cruelty complaint, how to receive and investigate a complaint, examples covering many situations, all NYS laws pertinent to animals - annotated with explanations, case law relevant to animal cases, basic animal care standards, appendices containing forms to use in cruelty investigations, handouts on various animal care topics, and articles pertinent to various animal issues.
Sue McDonough, NYSHA President and Police Officer, provided technical input and expertise; Pat Valusek, NYSHA Vice-President and technical writer, researched supplementary material and additional examples, and wrote the text. Material was gathered from individuals who worked for various agencies, such as DA's offices, the Animal Rescue League of Boston, the ASPCA, SPCA with active cruelty investigation programs, state agencies such as the Dept. of Ag. & Mkts., and various police agencies.
The entire manual, HTML format -or- 8M PDF file, is now available online. Use the HTML option if you want to view/print specific sections of the manual. Use the PDF option to view a printer-friendly version of the manual in its entirety. Downloading may take a while, but, in Adobe Acrobat Reader, you'll then be able to save a copy of the file or to print the file.
NYLJ: Gay Marriage Opponents Attack New Law on Multiple Fronts
A non-profit group called New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms, backed by the Liberty Counsel, charged in a lawsuit filed yesterdaythat the law had been rammed through the state Senate on the night of June 24 in violation of the Open Meetings Law and the Senate's own rules.
"Constitutional liberties were violated. Today we are asking the court to intervene in its rightful role as the check and balance on an out-of-control State Legislature," said Reverend Jason J. McGuire, executive director of the group and a resident of upstate Livingston County, where New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms v. New York State Senate was filed.
A spokesman for Governor Andrew M. Cuomo said in a statement that "the plaintiffs lack a basic understanding of the laws of the state of New York. The suit is without merit."
With a new ethics bill signed yesterday by Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, New York became one of a handful of states requiring its lawyer-legislators to disclose the identity of their clients. Under the Public Integrity Reform Act, lawyers will be required to publicly reveal the identity of their own clients and clients they referred to the firm, when the client is doing business with, receiving grants from, seeking legislation from or is in litigation with the state. Additionally, every appearance by a lawyer-legislator before a state administrative agency will be recorded by the agency and made public. New York joins California, Washington, Alaska and Louisiana in requiring its lawyer-lawmakers to reveal clients.
The disclosure requirement takes effect in mid-2013, covering matters occurring during the 2012 calendar year. It kicks in when the legal fee exceeds $10,000 and the state contract is worth more than $50,000 or the grant is worth more than $25,000. The law affects only new clients or new matters for existing clients and attorney-legislators will not have to identify clients who are being represented in connection with an investigation or prosecution, involved in a domestic relations matter or a bankruptcy or "where disclosure of a client's identity is likely to cause harm."
Explorer for Natural Gas Loses Rights, Money Paid for Them-NYLJ
"[T]he evidence clearly demonstrates that Cabot, a sophisticated business entity, made a calculated and knowing decision to enter into the lease, approve title and pay the signing bonus with full knowledge" of the protective covenant and the opposition of the property owners' association, Justice Gilpatric held in Weiden Lake Property Owners Association Inc. v. Klansky and Cabot Oil, 3885/09. "Therefore, it is not entitled to rescission of the lease under a mistake of law."
The Transgender Law and Policy Institute aims to advance transgender equality through advocating for non-discrimination laws and policy change. The number of transgender people in the United States population ranges from two to five percent and a smaller number are transsexual. Visitors will find that one of the many features on this very thorough site is under the Non-discrimination Laws" link, which consists of lists, maps, and charts of which states and municipalities have non-discrimination laws that include gender identity and expression. Some of these laws include prohibiting discrimination in public employment and policies regarding restrooms and other gender-based facilities. Visitors interested in reading about such transgender related litigation in criminal, immigration, medical, tax, discrimination, or tort law will appreciate the "Litigation: Case Law" link.
Oil & Gas Law Brief : New York Issues Economic Assessment Report Regarding Hydraulic Fracturing
From Keith B. Hall : Louisiana Lawyer : Stone Pigman Walther Wittmann Law Firm:
The New York Department of Environmental Conservationannounced today its release of a a lengthy Economic Assessment Report that evaluates the economic effects that would result from the use of hydraulic fracturing within New York. The DEC stated that its analysis "confirms that high-volume hydraulic fracturing activities could provide a substantial economic boost for the state in the areas of employment, wages and tax revenue for state and local governments."
Amazon to Introduce Book Lending to the Kindle | Inhabitat
Amazon appears poised to once again change the face of the book publishing industry. As if the Kindle wasn't enough, Amazon's new vision for e-readers could turn your Kindle into a full-blown library, with access to thousands of book titles. According to a report released in the Wall Street Journal, Amazon aims to do to book lending what Netflix has already done to movies by allowing users to pay a flat subscriber fee, and subsequently have access a large selection of books.
Residents sue town of Middlefield for drilling ban
From The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY:
A lawsuit has been filed against the town of Middlefield on behalf of Jennifer Huntington and other residents who have signed oil and gas leases, according to a media release from Levene, Gouldin & Thompson LLP, the Binghamton law firm retained for the effort.
The town passed a local law in June that prohibits heavy industry, including gas drilling.
NYLJ: Baum Firm to Pay $2 Million, Alter Practices
One of New York state's biggest foreclosure law firms will revamp its practices and pay a $2 million fine to settle a six-month probe by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District that found it had filed misleading pleadings, affidavits and mortgage assignments in state and federal courts.
In a settlement agreement announced today, the firm, Steven J. Baum, P.C. of Amherst, will implement a series of internal controls that include a pledge not to bring foreclosure actions without reviewing the original promissory notes or reviewing a copy of the note from its client or custodian of the document.
The 12-page agreement also prohibits the firm's employees from executing mortgage assignments as officials or representatives of MERS, an electronic mortgage registry system.
Secret U.S. Memo Made Legal Case to Kill a Citizen - NYTimes.com
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's secret legal memorandum that opened the door to the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born radical Muslim cleric hiding in Yemen, found that it would be lawful only if it were not feasible to take him alive, according to people who have read the document.
The memo, written last year, followed months of extensive interagency deliberations and offers a glimpse into the legal debate that led to one of the most significant decisions made byPresident Obama -- to move ahead with the killing of an American citizen without a trial.
The secret document provided the justification for acting despite an executive order banning assassinations, a federal law against murder, protections in the Bill of Rights and various strictures of the international laws of war, according to people familiar with the analysis. The memo, however, was narrowly drawn to the specifics of Mr. Awlaki's case and did not establish a broad new legal doctrine to permit the targeted killing of any Americans believed to pose a terrorist threat.
Divorce Cases Are Complicated by New Maintenance Rules-NYLJ
ALBANY - A new system for calculating interim maintenance awards in matrimonial actions, adopted last year to make no-fault divorce more palatable, is under fire from many attorneys who say it is confusing, and potentially inequitable.
Several matrimonial lawyers said the new rules are so rigid that they have taken from judges the discretion to decide fair temporary payments while divorce actions are pending.
But more and more lower court opinions have tackled the statute's anomalies.
In Scott M. v. Ilona M., 31 Misc. 3d 353, 915 N.Y.S. 2d 834 (2011), for instance, Justice Sunshine deviated from the guidelines by ruling that the temporary maintenance total was inadequate to meet the expenses of a wife and the couple's child, and he increased the amount, as well as awarded attorney's fees to the woman's attorney (NYLJ, Feb. 1).
Other cases, including J.H. v. W.H., 31 Misc.3d 1203(A), 2011 WL 1158653, and Jill G. v. Jeffrey G., 31 Misc.3d 1209(A), 2011 WL 1364481, have explored questions of how attorney's fees, child support and tax consequences should factor into the temporary maintenance formulas.
Meanwhile, court administrators have supplied judges and litigants with an eight-page online worksheet for calculating an appropriate maintenance award.
Topic:Lawyer's participation in residential real estate transaction that includes both a "seller's concession" and an equivalent "gross-up" in the sales
Digest:If the sales price in a residential real estatetransactionhasbeen "grossed-up" in exchange for a "seller's concession," all transaction documents containing the grossed- up sales price must disclose that the sales price has been increased by a sum equal to the seller's concession. Rules:8.4(c).
"...in a residential real estate transaction where the sales contract, the HUD-1 Settlement Statement, the transfer tax return and any other documents that contain the sales price [shall] each contain the following statement (or a substantially similar statement): "The sales price has been increased by a sum equal to the seller's concession."
The Agriculture Disaster Program is available to assist farms and on-farm producers in New York State damaged by Hurricane Irene and/or Tropical Storm Lee. Many New York State farms sustained significant damage by the recent storms and existing aid is primarily focused on crops and soil conservation. Under this program, $4,175,000 is available to provide financial assistance toward projects replacing and installing a farm's electric and natural gas distribution and use equipment and systems damaged during the storms in non-residential facilities.
Covered equipment includes pumps, compressors, lighting, HVAC, chillers, refrigeration, commercial washers and some natural gas (limited to 10% of total). Farm residences are not covered.
The funds will be dispensed on a first come first served basis. Limit is $100,000 per farm. The details are covered in the attached NYSERDA program description .
Creating a bibliography or set of references used to be quite time consuming, however a number of free programs and applications have helped make this process much simpler. One such application is CiteThisForMe, which allows users to create their own references via this handy form. CiteThisForMe uses the Harvard referencing style, and visitors just need to enter a number of details to create each reference. Visitors have the option to cite a book, newspaper, journal, website, or other type of source. This version is compatible with all operating systems.
Over the last few days, the Police Executive Research Forum has been the subject of several false articles and blog postings alleging that we have been coordinating police crackdowns on Occupy protests. This is not true. PERF conducted two conference calls for the sole purpose of allowing police chiefs to compare notes about their experiences with "Occupy" protests. The last conference call was held on November 4--more than two weeks ago.
PERF urges everyone who wishes to obtain an accurate view of PERF's work to read a report that we released in July 2011 called "Managing Major Events: Best Practices from the Field." This report, which is available on our website athttp://www.policeforum.org/dotAsset/1491727.pdf, summarizes the views of police leaders who participated in a PERF conference in November 2010 to discuss issues related to major events such as large-scale protests. See especially the following:
--Chapter 2, titled "A 'Softer' Approach to Crowd Management: The Vancouver Model," offers this advice: "Be proactive by reaching out to the public or influential community groups beforehand to inform them of your planned activities during an event.... Use the 'meet and greet' strategy. Engage the crowd in a friendly, non-confrontational manner....Most protesters are peaceful; don't allow a small group of instigators to provoke an aggressive response from officers."
--Chapter 7, titled "Preparing for Protesters at Major Events," includes this recommendation: "When dealing with law-breaking protesters, don't forget that thousands of nonviolent protesters are merely exercising their First Amendment rights. So the police must differentiate the lawbreaking protesters from those who are peaceful."
We also invite everyone to review our many other reports on our website (http://policeforum.org), which can be found in the "Free Doc Library" and "Critical Issues Series" sections. We believe that these documents will provide an accurate view of PERF's history of promoting community policing and police strategies that ensure that everyone's Constitutional rights, including First Amendment free speech rights, are protected.
Drilling Down: Archive of Oil and Gas Leases - Document - NYTimes.com
The New York Times has collected more than 111,000 oil and gas leases and related documents through open records requests made to more than six dozen counties with rich natural gas prospects. Over 100,000 of the documents in the archive are from Tarrant County, Tex., roughly 3,200 are from New York, and the remainder are from states including Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Related Article »
On Tuesday, Google announced something called Search, plus Your World (SPYW). It marked a startling transformation of the company's flagship product, Google Search, into an amplifier of social content. Google's critics--as well as some folks generally well intentioned towards Google--have complained that the social content it amplifies is primarily Google's own product, Google+.
New York State Legislative Task Force on Demographic Research and Reapportionment - Maps
For those interested in redistricting information, here is a link to the NYS Legislative Task Force on Demographic Research and Reapportionment. You will be able to see the proposed lines for all the NYS Assembly and Senators. The Congressional lines have not been released as of yet.
California Audit Finds Broad Irregularities in Foreclosures - NYTimes.com
The improprieties range from the basic -- a failure to warn borrowers that they were in default on their loans as required by law -- to the arcane. For example, transfers of many loans in the foreclosure files were made by entities that had no right to assign them and institutions took back properties in auctions even though they had not proved ownership.
Commissioned by Phil Ting, the San Francisco assessor-recorder, the report examined files of properties subject to foreclosure sales in the county from January 2009 to November 2011. About 84 percent of the files contained what appear to be clear violations of law, it said, and fully two-thirds had at least four violations or irregularities.
Mr. Fahringer told the circuit panel hearing United States v. Stewart, 10-3185-cr., that it was wrong to punish Ms. Stewart for comments made "on the steps of the courthouse," where there has always been "much wider latitude" for speech.
He urged the panel not to go "down that road" because "no one will be able to comment after a sentence for fear that the same thing could happen to them."
And when asked about Mr. Fahringer's argument that the benefit of the doubt goes to the speaker when the speech is ambiguous, Mr. Dember answered that "Judge Koeltl didn't find any of the statements ambiguous at all."
Reentry Net/NY is a support network and information clearinghouse on prison and jail reentry, and the consequences of criminal proceedings in New York State. Attorneys, social service providers, policy advocates, individuals with criminal records, family and community members are encouraged to join for full access to the online resource library, monthly mailings, and calendar updates.
Southern District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan (See Profile) on March 8 said the personal injury firm's lawsuit challenging Rule 5.4 of New York's Rules of Professional Conductmust fail because the rule is not the only one in New York that "forecloses plaintiffs from receiving non-lawyer equity investment," but it was the only one challenged by the firm.
Allowing users to find citing documents for an article is a key feature of Google Scholar. Ever since they added legal opinions, legal researchers have asked them to make it easy to find significant citing decisions for a case - that is, decisions that discuss a case at some length, possibly supporting it, overturning it or differentiating it from others. They are changing how they present citations to legal opinions. Now, instead of sorting the citing documents by their prominence, Scholar sorts them by the extent of discussion of the cited case. Opinions that discuss the cited case in detail are presented before ones that mention the case briefly. They indicate the extent of discussion visually and indicate opinions that discuss the cited case at length, that discuss it moderately and those that discuss it briefly. Opinions that don't discuss the cited case are left unmarked. For example, seeopinions citing Dique v. New Jersey State Police, 603 F. 3d 181.
Important Announcement from Commission on Forensic Science - NY DCJS
From: Marvin Schechter Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:42 PM To: 'NYSBA LISTSERV CJS (email@example.com)' Subject: IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT - COMMISSISON ON FORENSIC SCIENCE
As of Monday, March 26th the briefing materials which are given to members of the NYS Commission on Forensic Science (CFS) are now being posted on the website of the Division of Criminal JusticeServices in a non-searchable PDF format. These briefing materials include inter alia the accreditation assessments done by ASCLD/LAB (the entity which currently inspects laboratories and recommends their accreditation and whose reports the CFS is entirely dependent upon), the DCJS Annual Assessments of NY laboratories for the entire year, comments from various organizations regarding the Inspector General's Report which among other things was highly critical of the CS's role with respect to the failure (and eventual closing) of the Nassau County Police Laboratory. There are also documents which show the errors laboratories make, how these are discovered and how the errors are corrected.
In future briefing materials you can expect to see copies of "Self-Accreditation Reports" which are documents that contain checklists involving all aspects of what a laboratory does and which laboratory directors sign-off noting what is done and what is not followed by ASCLD/LAB criticisms which must then be corrected.
While the above references to materials may be unfamiliar to many here is what you can expect to find. First the plethora of reports are specifically keyed to a laboratory, e.g. The Westchester County Department of Laboratories and Research. The DCJS Annual Assessments of letters from the laboratories detailing specifically errors made in forensic analysis across the broad spectrum of the forensic disciplines, what the laboratory did to correct the error and who was notified, e.g., on April 18, 2011, the Forensic Laboratories of the Onondaga County Health Department, Center for Forensic Studies (Onondaga) reported a weight discrepancy to ASCLD/LAB which led to an exchange of letters between ASCLD/LAB and Onondaga as to the cause of the discrepancy, the institution of random testing of past work of the examiner involved and corrective actions which were done to the satisfaction of ASCLD/LAB. The correspondence reveals that the ADA was notified of the discrepancy. Such material provides practitioners with an inside look at how problems can arise in the laboratory setting and may provide insights into how practitioners will treat discovery requests and prepare for direct and cross examination. Also by reviewing such materials practitioners for the first time will have specific information to give judges about how a laboratory is working, any problems it may be having and thus provide jurists with a better understanding of how to handle oral arguments involving discovery and objections to the same.
Sometimes discrepancies cannot be explained as was the case in letter from the ASCLD/LAB Biology Proficiency Review Committee (PRC) on May 11, 2011, to the Westchester County Laboratory regarding DNA samples in a proficiency test. The proficiency test (including the samples)had been prepared by an outside agency. After investigation the laboratory speculated to the PRC what the root cause of the discrepancy might be (possible degradation of the 20 year old sample) but could not explain why there was no degradation in two other samples received in the proficiency test. Remarkably the laboratory told the PRC that "we have seen similar problems in CTS samples, which we can only postulate are attributable to variations in their sample preparation."
These example noted herein are simply to illustrate the wealth of information and new avenues of inquiry which are now available to both prosecutors and defense attorneys who are engaged in pre-trial preparation of cases involving forensic issues. It is now axiomatic that counsel who have forensic issues in a NYS case must as a matter of course review the online materials of the CFS to discover whether the laboratory which is involved in the testing of materials that are germane to a particular case is having or has had problems either specifically related to the forensic discipline at issue or general operational problems that go the laboratory's credibility.
In addition to written materials, you can also view on the DCJS website a complete videotape of the CFS meetings. I do not know if the video is downloadable but if not one can request a disc by callingthe CFS. To get to the written materials and/or view the video go to the DCJS website, look on the left side of webpage for the title "Open Meetings," click on "Open Meetings," go to "Date of CFS Meeting," click on either the written materials or the video button.
As your Chair and also a member of the CFS, I am available to anyone who has questions about the import of the above. I look forward to hearing from you.
(Editor's note: This material is very difficult to find. Here is a link to the page.
"While I understand your firm's position on partner advancement, it creates a rather difficult situation for our company as we move forward," says a letter (PDF) dated February 1, 2000, with the writer's name redacted. "We have remained a Kelley Drye client largely in part to your personal involvement in the growth of our company from 1970 to the present day."
How much did a Kelley Drye life partner earn? At the time the dispute was unfolding, according to excerpts of a Kelley Drye partnership agreement (PDF) made public Monday, attorneys who had achieved that status received a fixed annual income based on their average earnings in their three peak-earning years as equity partners. (The same agreement shows the firm protecting itself against becoming over committed to retired partners by capping life partner salaries at 4 percent of the firm's partnership earnings in a given fiscal year and requiring that any individual life partner cannot be paid more than half the average partner earnings for the year.)
Jumping ahead, the next letter (PDF) contained in the unsealed documents that management sent to D'Ablemont is dated July 2008. It involves a separate dispute between the two sides--whether or not legal services provided to D'Ablemont's family should be paid for by the firm.
Last week, on April 2, 2012, the 1940 United States census was released to the public in digital format by the National Archives in conjunction with the U.S Census Bureau athttp://1940census.archives.gov
As of May 1, eligible workers over 18 can access their Social Security statements online -- and view their earnings and benefit information -- by creating an account at My Social Security.
You'll need to provide some personal information (address, Social Security number, phone number) that matches information already on file with Social Security to verify your identity, and answer a few questions for security purposes.
-The tool shows three options for your monthly benefit amount based on your current earnings rate: at full retirement age; at age 70; and at early retirement age (62). The estimates are based on your average earnings to date and assume you will earn the same annual income from now until retirement.
New IRS Publication for Conduit Issuers of Tax-Exempt Bonds
The Internal Revenue Service has released the new Publication 5005, Your Responsibilities as a Conduit Issuer of Tax-Exempt Bonds. This publication provides an overview for state and local governments of the responsibilities of the conduit issuer with respect to tax compliance in municipal financing arrangements commonly known as conduit financings.
This publication is based on the recommendations of the TE/GE Advisory Committee, also known as the ACT.
This new child support website includes links to federal and state child support resources - as well as OTDA's new Application for Support Services Form and the new IWO forms for use in both Family and Supreme Court.
Additionally - please be aware that that amendments to the Uncontested Divorce Packet will include a special set of simplified instructions about the new IWO and applications for child support services, copies of which can be obtained at:
...Formal Opinion No. 743, issued by the New York County Lawyers' Association Committee on Professional Ethics, which addressed the issue of how lawyers can ethically use social media for juror research during trials. The committee concluded that pursuant to RPA 3.5 it is ethically permissible for attorneys to conduct research and follow jurors' social media interactions only if the jurors are unaware of the monitoring.
More recently, the New York City Bar Association's Committee on Professional Ethics addressed a similar issue in Formal Opinion 2012. The specific issue addressed was: "What ethical restrictions, if any, apply to an attorney's use of social media websites to research potential or sitting jurors?"
The committee reached the same conclusion as the New York County Ethics Committee and concluded that lawyers can use social media to research jurors, so long as the jurors remain unaware that the research is occurring.
The committee explained that it was important to ensure that a juror did not learn of of the attorney's actions, whether in the form of a notification from the social media site or otherwise. If the attorney knew a juror would be aware of the monitoring, then it would be unethical to conduct the research on that particular site. Furthermore, even if the attorney was unaware that a notification would be sent, if the juror subsequently learned of the monitoring, then it could still qualify as a prohibited communication in violation of RPE 3.5.
What's new? In simple terms, Verizon will launch on June 28 Share Everything Plans that share unlimited voice and texting across all the devices on a customer's account. Data will also be shared for up to 10 of those devices, including smartphones and tablets.
Verizon will charge a monthly line access charge per device, ranging from $10 for a tablet to $40 for a smartphone. Basic cell phones will be $30 a month, while Wi-Fi access devices, netbooks and notebooks will be $20 a month.
On top of that, data service will be charged at a rate starting at $50 for 1 GB per month, which can be shared across 10 devices. The rates go up as follows: 2GB for $60; 4 GB for $70; 6 GB for $80; 8 GB for $90 and 10 GB for $100. There is an overage charge of $15 for each 1 GB of data service.
A new study found no evidence that health care costs in Texas dipped after a 2003 constitutional amendment limited payouts in medical malpractice lawsuits, despite claims made to voters by some backers of tort reform.
The researchers, who include University of Texas law professor Charles Silver, examined Medicare spending in Texas counties and saw no reduction in doctors' fees for seniors and disabled patients between 2002 and 2009.
In what might just be the nicest cease-and-desist letter ever, the people at Jack Daniel's Properties not only politely explained the situation to Wensink, the offending author, the company even offered to help pay for the cost of designing a new cover.
Jack Daniel's Properties isn't even forcing Wensink to take his book off the shelf. Instead, the company just wants him to change the cover when it's reprinted.
The purpose of this guidebook is to advise public housing agencies (PHAs) and other organizations providing services to PHAs, regarding the administration of the tenant-based subsidy programs. It includes an historical review of the tenant-based rental assistance programs, discusses program requirements in detail, and provides helpful administrative practices currently used by PHAs that operate the program.
The new Housing Choice Voucher Program Guidebook (7420.10g) is enroute to Public Housing Agencies and HUD field offices through the normal hud distribution process. Additional hard copies may be requested from the HUD distribution center by telephone (1-800-767-7468) or on-line at HUDclips. An electronic copy may also be downloaded from link below.
The new Housing Choice Voucher Program Guidebook (7420.10g) is now available. It serves to advise PHAs and other organizations providing services to PHAs, regarding the administration of the tenant-based subsidy programs.
This is Part One in a two-part series of columns on two New York State appeals court panel decisions and the law relating to stop and frisk. Part Two will appear on August 15 here on Justia's Verdict. -Ed.
At the end of June and the beginning of July, respectively, two panels of a New York State appeals court (the Appellate Division, First Department) each ruled that police had violated a suspect's state constitutional rights against unreasonable searches and seizures, and that as a result, the trial judges should have suppressed the weapons found on the suspects--that is, the judges should have excluded the weapons from evidence that could be introduced against the defendants at a criminal trial.
In one sense, the distinctive aspects of New York law have little bearing on the suppressions at issue in the two New York cases, In re Darryl C. and In the Matter of Jaquan M. In both of those cases, the majorities of the appellate court panels did not dispute that police were justified in taking the first two steps discussed in De Bour: (1) approaching to request information, and (2) posing the more pointed questions that would plainly be aimed only at a suspect. Both courts found, however, that the police lacked "reasonable suspicion" to believe that the suspects were committing, had committed, or were about to commit a crime, and that the police also lacked reasonable suspicion to believe that the suspects posed a danger or were armed. On their face, then, it would seem that these two decisions represent fact-specific applications of a standard that is, for the most part, the same under federal and New York State constitutional law.
USCIS - Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Process
How do I request consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals? To request consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals from USCIS, you must submitForm I-821D, Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals to USCIS. This form must be completed, properly signed and accompanied by a Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, and a Form I-765WS, Worksheet, establishing your economic need for employment. If you fail to submit a completed Form I-765 (along with the accompanying filing fees for that form, totaling $465), USCIS will not consider your request for deferred action. Please read the form instructions to ensure that you submit all the required documentation to support your request.
You must file your request for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals at the USCIS Lockbox. You can find the mailing address and instructions on www.uscis.gov/i-821d. After your Form I-821D, Form I-765, and Form I-765 Worksheet have been received, USCIS will review them for completeness, including submission of the required fee, initial evidence and supporting documents. If it is determined that the request is complete, USCIS will send you a receipt notice. USCIS will then send you an appointment notice to visit an Application Support Center (ASC) for biometric services. Please make sure you read and follow the directions in the notice. Failure to attend your biometrics appointment may delay processing of your request for consideration of deferred action, or may result in a denial of your request. You may also choose to receive an email and/or text message notifying you that your form has been accepted by completing a Form G-1145, E-Notification of Application/Petition Acceptance.
Each request for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals will be reviewed on an individual, case-by-case basis. USCIS may request more information or evidence from you, or request that you appear at a USCIS office. USCIS will notify you of its determination in writing.
Note: All individuals who believe they meet the guidelines, including those in removal proceedings, with a final removal order, or with a voluntary departure order (and not in immigration detention), may affirmatively request consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals from USCIS through this process. Individuals who are currently in immigration detention and believe they meet the guidelines may not request consideration of deferred action from USCIS but may identify themselves to their detention officer or to the ICE Office of the Public Advocate through the Office's hotline at 1-888-351-4024 (staffed 9 a.m. - 5 p.m., Monday - Friday) or by email atEROPublicAdvocate@ice.dhs.gov.
Will USCIS conduct a background check when reviewing my request for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals? Yes. You must undergo biographic and biometric background checks before USCIS will consider whether to exercise prosecutorial discretion under the consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals process. If you have been convicted of any felony, a significant misdemeanor offense, three or more misdemeanor offenses not occurring on the same date and not arising out of the same act, omission, or scheme of misconduct, or otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety, you will not be considered for deferred action for childhood arrivals except where DHS determines there are exceptional circumstances.
What do background checks involve? Background checks involve checking biographic and biometric information provided by the individuals against a variety of databases maintained by DHS and other federal government agencies.
If USCIS does not exercise deferred action in my case, will I be placed in removal proceedings? If you have submitted a request for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals and USCIS decides not to defer action in your case, USCIS will apply its policy guidance governing the referral of cases to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the issuance of Notices to Appear (NTA). If your case does not involve a criminal offense, fraud, or a threat to national security or public safety, your case will not be referred to ICE for purposes of removal proceedings except where DHS determines there are exceptional circumstances. For more detailed information on the applicable NTA policy visit www.uscis.gov/NTA. If after a review of the totality of circumstances USCIS determines to defer action in your case, USCIS will likewise exercise its discretion and will not issue you a Notice to Appear.
Can I obtain a fee waiver or fee exemption for this process? There are no fee waivers available for employment authorization applications connected to the deferred action for childhood arrivals process. There are very limited fee exemptions available. Requests for fee exemptions must be filed and favorably adjudicated before an individual files his/her request for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals without a fee. In order to be considered for a fee exemption, you must submit a letter and supporting documentation to USCIS demonstrating that you meet one of the following conditions:
You are under 18 years of age, homeless, in foster care or under 18 years of age and otherwise lacking any parental or other familial support, and your income is less than 150% of the U.S. poverty level.
You cannot care for yourself because you suffer from a serious, chronic disability and your income is less than 150% of the U.S. poverty level.
You have, at the time of the request, accumulated $25,000 or more in debt in the past 12 months as a result of unreimbursed medical expenses for yourself or an immediate family member, and your income is less than 150% of the U.S. poverty level.
Additional information on how to make your request for a fee exemption is available onwww.uscis.gov/childhoodarrivals. Your request must be submitted and decided before you submit a request for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals without a fee. In order to be considered for a fee exemption, you must provide documentary evidence to demonstrate that you meet any of the above conditions at the time that you make the request. For evidence, USCIS will:
Accept affidavits from community-based or religious organizations to establish a requestor's homelessness or lack of parental or other familial financial support.
Accept copies of tax returns, banks statement, pay stubs, or other reliable evidence of income level. Evidence can also include an affidavit from the applicant or a responsible third party attesting that the applicant does not file tax returns, has no bank accounts, and/or has no income to prove income level.
Accept copies of medical records, insurance records, bank statements, or other reliable evidence of unreimbursed medical expenses of at least $25,000.
Address factual questions through requests for evidence (RFEs).
Will there be supervisory review of decisions by USCIS under this process? Yes. USCIS will implement a supervisory review process in all four Service Centers to ensure a consistent process for considering requests for deferred action for childhood arrivals. USCIS will require officers to elevate for supervisory review those cases that involve certain factors.
Can I appeal USCIS's determination? No. You cannot file a motion to reopen or reconsider, and cannot appeal the decision if USCIS denies your request for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals. USCIS will not review its discretionary determinations. You may request a review using the Service Request Management Tool (SRMT) process if you met all of the process guidelines and you believe that your request was denied due to one of the following errors:
USCIS denied the request for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals based on abandonment and you claim that you did respond to a Request for Evidence within the prescribed time; or
USCIS mailed the Request for Evidence to the wrong address, even though you had submitted a Form AR-11, Change of Address, or changed your address online atwww.uscis.gov before the issuance of the Request for Evidence.
Can I extend the period of deferred action in my case? Yes. Unless terminated, individuals whose case is deferred pursuant to the consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals process will not be placed into removal proceedings or removed from the United States for a period of two years. You may request consideration for an extension of that period of deferred action. As long as you were not above the age of 30 on June 15, 2012, you may request a renewal after turning 31. Your request for an extension will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
If my period of deferred action is extended, will I need to re-apply for an extension of my employment authorization? Yes. If USCIS decides to defer action for additional periods beyond the initial two years, you must also have requested an extension of your employment authorization.
Will USCIS personnel responsible for reviewing requests for an exercise of prosecutorial discretion under this process receive special training? Yes. USCIS personnel responsible for considering requests for consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals will receive special training.
The frequently referenced, ever expanding (over 500 pages!) spiral bound 8.3 x 5.7 book in signature blue is now available on all Apple iOS devices, including the iPad, iPhone and iPod touch via the Rulebook App. as an in-app purchase for $39.99.
For one day only, August 22, 2012, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Bankruptcy Procedure, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure and Evidence may be downloaded at no charge on the rulebook app . All you need to do is download the free app and then download the federal rules, which will be priced "free" on that day.
Need to sign a document when you are on the go? The HelloSign app saves you from the laborious process of printing, signing and scanning.. All you need to do is:
1) Import any PDF from your email or take a picture of the document you need to have signed. 2) Create a realistic signature with your finger. Looks just like an ink signature. 3) Via email, send the signed document to the desired recipient(s).
Use HelloSign to sign and complete important and timely documents such as consulting agreements, NDA's, sales real estate contracts, financing agreements and more...
Key Features: • Fingertip document signing • Edit any PDF or photo to add text, checkmark or signature • Upload a document with camera • Sign unlimited documents • Open PDF files directly from your inbox • Signed document are imported back into your email to make sending easy • Always free and easy to use
Revised Jury Instructions Hope to Deter Juror Use of Social Media During Trial | United States Courts
A Judicial Conference Committee has updated themodel set of jury instructions(pdf) federal judges use to deter jurors from using social media to research or communicate about cases on which they serve. The new guidelines provide detailed explanations of the consequences of social media use during a trial, along with recommendations for repeated reminders of the ban on social media usage.
The update comes in response to a national survey of federal trial judges by the Federal Judicial Center at the request of the Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management (CACM).
"The overwhelming majority of judges take steps to warn jurors not to use social media during trial, but the judges surveyed said additional steps should be taken," said Judge Julie A. Robinson, CACM Committee chair. "The judges recommended that jurors frequently be reminded about the prohibition on social media before the trial, at the close of a case, at the end of each day before jurors return home, and other times, as appropriate. Jurors should be told why refraining from use of social media promotes a fair trial. Finally, jurors should know the consequences of violations during trial, such as mistrial and wasted time. Those recommendations are now part of the guidelines."
As part of the Tax Exempt and Government Entities (TE/GE) operating division of the Internal Revenue Service, EO strives to support the IRS mission of ensuring that all customers understand and meet their tax responsibilities. It does this by offering specialized assistance to the full range of organizations exempt from Federal income tax under the Internal Revenue Code. EO's programs and services help these organizations understand and comply with tax laws and regulations governing their tax-exempt status.
The Director of EO plans, manages, directs, and executes nationwide activities for EO. The Director reports to the TE/GE Division Commissioner. The Director also supervises and is responsible for EO's offices of Customer Education & Outreach, Rulings & Agreements, and Examinations.
The EO Customer Education & Outreach office coordinates, assists, and supports the development of internal and external communications, forms and publications, and external education and outreach efforts, including this website.
The EO Rulings and Agreements office processes applications for tax exemption and provides direction through private letter rulings and technical guidance.
The EO Examinations office promotes compliance by analyzing operational and financial activities of exempt organizations. These activities include developing processes to identify areas of noncompliance, developing corrective strategies, and assisting other EO functions in implementing these strategies.
To find out more about EO, or for more information about exempt organization tax compliance issues, visit the EO pages at the IRS website. For account-specific questions, call TE/GE's Customer Account Services, toll-free, at 877-829-5500.
Judges whose license plates identify the office they hold may, in effect, be trading on their positions to avoid the consequences of being stopped for traffic infractions, the state Commission on Judicial Conduct has suggested.
Prompted by a recent disciplinary decision, the commission is seeking input for a public report to address the issue of whether the special vehicle plates violate the code of judicial conduct. It sent letters earlier this month to more than 200 judicial and legal organizations seeking input.
The commission initially disclosed in Matter of Schilling that it planned to conduct the study. In that case, the commission recommended the removal of former town justice Diane Schilling of East Greenbush, Rensselaer County, for arranging to fix one traffic ticket issued to herself and another to the wife of a fellow justice (NYLJ, May 11).
In his letter seeking input, commission administrator Robert Tembeckjian said the agency's staff is studying how many judicial plates are issued in New York, who holds them and if the plates carry any special privileges for the bearers. The staff is also researching the policies of other states on issuing plates identifying a vehicle as being owned by a judge.
" In resolving a central question presented by these appeals, we hold that courts must evaluate the adequacy of an IEP prospectively as of the time of the parents' placement decision and may not consider "retrospective" testimony regarding services not listed in the IEP. However, we reject a rigid "four-corners rule" that would prevent a court from considering evidence explicating the written terms of the IEP."
IN THE MATTER OF KINDLON--Decided September 27, 2012.
Respondent's misconduct arose out of his representation of a criminal defendant. During a recess in the trial and while the prosecutor was outside the courtroom, respondent viewed, handled and photographed a document that was on the prosecution's table. Respondent did not seek, nor was he ever granted, permission by the prosecutor to examine, handle or photograph the document.
As you may have noticed, the IRS has made extensive changes to the look and functionality of the IRS.gov website. These changes aim to improve online services for all stakeholders with the best content and Web experience that the IRS can offer.
The new navigation is one of the most significant changes users will see on IRS.gov. While the home page looks similar, there are new colors, new headings and a completely new way to navigate the site. To maintain a measure of continuity between the old and new, you'll find a menu list in the upper right-hand corner called "Information for..." that incorporates virtually all content from the old site under familiar headings such as "Charities and Non-Profits," Government Entities," "Retirement Plans" and "Tax Exempt Bonds." Alternately, you can always use the web address irs.gov/govt typed directly into your browser's address window to access the page.
If you bookmarked pages in the old website, check the redesigned site and update your bookmarks and favorites. A new feature on every page gives you the option of clicking a heart graphic to save the page as a bookmark.
MobileLaw for iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iPhone 5, iPod touch (3rd generation), iPod touch (4th generation), iPod touch (5th generation) and iPad on the iTunes App Store
The MobileLaw™ application is a legal text navigation platform that currently includes more than 200 United States legal texts for download, including federal statutes and codes from New York, California, and Texas. Texts are uploaded constantly, and each is free for you to download and use at your convenience. No subscriptions; no fees.
Search for the codes you want, bookmark the sections you find, add the notes you want, and email them all for future reference.
Eliminate the cumbersome "page flipping" inherent with the use of other electronic references - the MobileLaw™ application provides the user an accordion-style, expandable table of contents, which gives immediate access to the rule you need intuitively and elegantly. Adjacent statutory provisions are available with a swipe to the right or left.
Portable E-Transcript is a professional grade application available for your iPad® or iPhone®.You can review and annotate E-Transcripts anytime, anywhere - all you need is an iPad or iPhone to begin using your E-Transcript electronic witness testimony transcripts on the go.
Portable E-Transcript features: • Works on your iPad and iPhone • Word Index helps you search and find terms within your E-Transcript • Receive E-Transcript format (PTX) via email, Dropbox, and iTunes® • Ability to add electronic highlighting and notes • Email a transcript with highlighting and notes from iPad or iPhone • Update the transcript in the desktop version of Westlaw Case Notebook to include the highlighting and notes added in the app"
iPhone JD (Jeff Richardson) sums up his review: If you already use Westlaw Case Notebook to manage your litigation files, then I imagine that this app would be very useful. If you don't use that product, then I doubt that you will want to use this app to highlight a transcript because you have no easy way to export the file with your annotations. Even so, this is an app that every litigator should keep on their iPhone and iPad just in case they receive a .ptx file from a court reporter or another attorney. With this app installed, at least you can look at the transcript immediately without having to go to a PC or ask to have the file sent to you again in another format such as pure text or PDF.
Click here to get Westlaw Case Notebook Portable E-Transcript (free):
A majority of the three-judge Second Circuit panel, in a ruling by Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs (See Profile), concluded that the definition violated the Equal Protection Clause. Its opinion joined an earlier decision by the First Circuit in Boston.
JURIST - Paper Chase: Update all JURIST bookmarks and feeds to jurist.org!
Friday, November 09, 2012
Update all JURIST bookmarks and feeds to jurist.org! Matthew Shames at 12:30 AM ET
[JURIST announcement] If you have not already done so, please update all of your bookmarks and RSS feeds to jurist.org. As part of our continuing transition from our old domain (jurist.law.pitt.edu) to our current domain (jurist.org), the University of Pittsburgh will soon be disabling public access to our old server. At that time, any RSS feeds and bookmarks that are still pointing to jurist.law.pitt.edu will cease to function. Don't miss out on the latest legal news from JURIST - update your bookmarks and feeds today!
Although public employers may be aware of their obligation to provide certain types of employees with an opportunity for a hearing prior to imposing discipline (such as a written reprimand), the line between a non-disciplinary counseling memorandum and a disciplinary reprimand is not always clear. The New York State Court of Appeals' recent decision in Matter of Michael D'Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term "reprimand" may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate.
How I Went Completely Paperless in Two Days-lifehacker
Adam Dachis describes a system he uses for his "paperless" office. It uses:
Doxie One or Doxie Go ($149-199): The Doxie One is the cheaper of the two scanners, but the Doxie Go comes with a battery so you can scan on the go. Personally, I use the Doxie Go so I can more easily scan away from my computer (and watch TV during those big scanning jobs) but either model will do the job just fine.
Evernote: You'll use Evernote to store and organize your new digital paper. Download the app and sign up for an account (if you don't have one already).
Eye-Fi X2 Card (Optional, $30): When you put an Eye-Fi card in Doxie, it'll transfer scans over Wi-Fi back to your computer. While it requires a little extra setup, Doxie works much better this way. All you have to do is scan and check your computer moments later to find the file(s).
[JURIST] The Office for Civil Rights of the US Department of Education [official website] issued guidance [text, PDF] on Friday, clarifying school districts' existing legal obligations to give disabled students an equal chance to compete in extracurricular sports alongside their able-bodied classmates. The US Secretary for Education Arne Duncan [official profile]acknowledges the critical role sports play in the school experience.
Access to Court Opinions Expands | United States Courts
A pilot project giving the public free, text-searchable, online-access to court opinions now is available to all federal appellate, district and bankruptcy courts.
The Judicial Conference, the policy-making body of the Federal court system, approved national implementation of the project with the Government Printing Office, Federal Digital System (FDsys), which provides free access to publications from all three branches of federal government via the Internet. The pilot project pulls opinions nightly from courts' Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) systems and sends them to the GPO, where they are processed and posted on the FDsys website. The functionality to transfer opinions to FDsys is included in the latest release of CM/ECF which is now available to all courts. Twenty-nine courts participated in the original pilot, and now, all courts may opt to participate in the program.
Access to judicial opinions through FDsys allows the Judiciary to make its work more easily available to the public. Collections are divided into appellate, district or bankruptcy court opinions and are text-searchable across opinions and across courts. FDsys also permits embedded animation and audio.
Presently, more than 600,000 opinions dating back to 2004 are available. Opinions from the pilot are already one of the most heavily used collections on FDsys, with millions of retrievals each month.
More than 200 years after his birth, on Feb. 12, 1809, and with a movie about him in the Oscar spotlight, Abraham Lincolnremains a source of fascination to Americans, including those in the world of law.
The public can learn more about one of Lincoln's most enduringly controversial Civil War decisions -- to suspend habeas corpus. Lincoln first suspended habeas corpus in April 1861, amid fears that Maryland would join the rebellion. A full narrative of the habeas dispute and the Supreme Court Chief Justice's response in the opinion Ex Parte Merryman is available on the Federal Judicial Centerwebsite.
Throughout the Civil War, Lincoln carefully weighed which limits on liberties were necessary to maintain the Union. He considered the legal authority for suspending habeas secondary to his obligation "to preserve, protect, and defend" the Constitution. There were many who disagreed with that position.
The Federal Judicial Center's website covers the opinion, the legal questions raised by Lincoln's decision, legal arguments, and more. Learn about the opinion, read about popularmedia response at the time, or conduct your own classroom debate on the suspension of habeas corpus.
NYS Office of Court Administration Executive Director Ronald Younkins said the remodeled site OCA contains the same information as in the past, such as news and insight for general consumers, jurors and lawyers, but is designed to make it easier to quickly find information.
1) Global Navigation Bar: Use this to reach the different main sections of the site.
2) Global Search: Search the entire contents of the NYCOURTS.GOV web site.
3) NYcourts.gov logo: Takes you back to NYCOURTS.GOV homepage.
4) Subject Bar: Identifies the subject area for that part of the site. Takes you back to the homepage for that subject.
5) Subject's Left Navigation: Find content within that subject area
6) Page Content Area: The information you are looking for.
The case, FTC v. PCCare247, Inc., involves a group of individuals based in India who allegedly "tricked American consumers into spending money to fix non-existent problems with their computers." After problems with more conventional methods of international service, the court exercised its authority under the federal rules to fashion its own means of service. As Judge Engelmayer's order explains, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) allows a judge to order a means of service of process so long as it is "(1) not prohibited by international agreement; and (2) comports with constitutional notions of due process." In this case, service by Facebook was not specifically prohibited by relevant international agreement, including the Hague Service Convention, to which India and the United States are signatories. Further, the circumstances in which the Facebook accounts would be served ensured service was constitutionally proper.
The Rochester Law Digest is an independently owned and operated bi-monthly publication covering recent decisions and opinions from all the New York appellate courts, as well as articles of general interest to the legal community.
You can stay informed about recent appellate decisions from across the state by reviewing their bi-monthly Digest and "Just Released" page. You can also sign up for their bi-monthly digest and email notice of updates to their "Just Released" page.
For now all this goodness is free.
To all those who recently signed-up, thank you for your interest in the Rochester Law Digest mailing list. The "Just Released" page of the website www.rochesterlawdigest.com was updated on April 27th, 2013, with summaries of selected Appellate Division and Court of Appeals cases released last week. The next issue of the Digest will be out on May 1 and I hope to include summaries of any decisions that are released next Tuesday (April 30) in the Digest. The next update of the "Just Released" page of the website will include cases released between May 1st and May 3rd. I hope you find the summaries (and Digest) useful.
Updated Edition of Benchbook Now Available | United States Courts
The 6th edition (pdf) of the Benchbook for U.S. District Court Judges, a publication of the Federal Judicial Center, is now available online. The book, last updated in 2007, is a concise and practical guide to situations federal judges are likely to encounter on the bench. TheBenchbook covers procedures that are required by statute, rule or case law, with detailed guidance from experienced trial judges. And although new judges may benefit the most from the Benchbook, even experienced judges may find useful reminders about how to deal with routine matters, suggestions for handling more complex issues, and helpful starting points in new situations.
The 6th Edition includes a primer on a prosecutor's duty to disclose favorable information to defendants under Brady v. Maryland. There's a new section on civil pretrial case management focusing on the judge's role as an active case manager, and a completely revised section on sentencing, which contains an extensive colloquy for the sentencing hearing. There also are subsections on handling disruptive or dangerous defendants, and expanded jury instructions on the use of social media. Due to budgetary constraints, this edition of the Benchbook is published in electronic format only.
Download the 6th edition (pdf) of the Benchbook for U.S. District Court Judges.
Known informally as the psychiatrists' bible, the $199 tome from the American Psychiatric Association is the guidebook that US doctors will use to diagnose mental disorders. The latest edition is the first major update in 20 years.
At the April 9, 2012 Full Board meeting, the Members of the Authority issued a declaratory ruling regarding the involvement of licensees, internet technology companies and third party advertisers in online sales of alcoholic beverages. This declaratory rulingprovides guidance to licensees with respect to whether such relationships violate the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. In addition, based on information obtained while this matter was being considered, the Members of the Authority also issued an advisoryproviding guidance to manufacturers, wholesalers and importers with respect to their ability to sell wines featuring the same brand, trade name and vintage with or without the addition of a sticker featuring the wording "Direct," "Reserve," or any similar wording. The declaratory ruling and advisory are available on the Authority's website. Chairman Rosen also announced that the Authority will be hosting meetings with industry members to further examine the issues involved with internet sales of alcoholic beverages.
Bradley Manning Trial Transcripts | Freedom of the Press Foundation
The US military has refused to release transcripts of Bradley Manning's trial. In addition, they've denied press passes to 270 out of the 350 media organizations that applied. Without public transcripts or a press pass, it's virtually impossible for media organizations to accurately cover the trial and for the public to know what the government is doing in its name.
In response, Freedom of the Press Foundation has crowd-sourced funding to place a professional stenographer in the media room covering the trial. We will post full transcripts shortly after each day's proceedings end. The morning session with be posted by 7 pm the same evening. The afternoon session will be posted by 9 am the next morning. The transcripts will be released under an Attribution 3.0 Unported Creative Commons license.
New York Times Limits Mobile Readers To 3 Articles Per Day From June 27 | Ubergizmo
New York Times, one of the most read news sources online and offline, announced today that mobile users will now be restricted to 3 free articles per day starting from June 27th. Those who want to read more than that would have to subscribe. Up till now readers who have been accessing the publication through its apps or mobile site were allowed to read 10 to 15 articles per day for free from the Top News section, that changes now.
If you have ever dreamed of having access to over 2.3 million newspaper pages from 65 newspapers in northern New York, this website will make that dream a reality. Created and maintained by the Northern New York Library Network, the online collection contains historical newspapers from counties that include Clinton, Essex, Oswego, and St. Lawrence. The dailies here include the Clarkson Integrator, the Essex County Republican, and the Plattsburgh Daily Press. Visitors should not miss the How To Search area to get acquainted with the best way to access particular subjects of interest. Additionally, the FAQ area contains helpful links for those seeking to support the initiative through donations and other forms of aid.
Notice of Claim and Certificate of Designation for Service of Notice of Claim-NYS Secretary of State
The General Municipal Law was recently amended in relation to service of notices of claim against public corporations. Public corporations, as defined in the General Construction Law, include municipal corporations, district corporations and public benefit corporations. Specifically, General Municipal Law section 53 was amended to permit notices of claim against public corporations to be served on the New York Secretary of State. The New York Department of State will forward the notice of claim to the person designated by the public corporation to receive the notice of claim.
Public corporations will be required to file a certificate with the New York Department of State designating the New York Secretary of State as their agent for service of notices of claim. The certificate must provide address information for the transmittal of notices of claim. Failure of a public corporation to file such a certificate will not invalidate any notice of claim served on the New York Secretary of State.
A person serving a notice of claim on the New York Secretary of State will be charged a $250 service fee. Half of the service fee will be retained by the New York Secretary of State and the other half provided to the public corporation or public corporations named in the notice of claim. Public corporations that do not file a Certificate of Designation of Notice of Claim with the New York Department of State will not receive a share of the service fees.
Certificates of Designation of Notice of Claim may be filed online. Online filing is available from 7:00 a.m. to 11:30 p.m.
Paper forms are also available. Completed paper forms may be sent to the Department of State, Division of Corporations, State Records and Uniform Commercial Code, One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12231.
The Secretary of State may be served with notices of claim against public corporations beginning Monday, July 15, 2013.
WASHINGTON -- In more than a dozen classified rulings, the nation's surveillance court has created a secret body of law giving the National Security Agency the power to amass vast collections of data on Americans while pursuing not only terrorism suspects, but also people possibly involved in nuclear proliferation, espionage and cyberattacks, officials say.
The rulings, some nearly 100 pages long, reveal that the court has taken on a much more expansive role by regularly assessing broad constitutional questions and establishing important judicial precedents, with almost no public scrutiny, according to current and former officials familiar with the court's classified decisions.
EPIC - In re EPIC - NSA Telephone Records Surveillance
EPIC Files Supreme Court Petition, Challenges Domestic Surveillance Program: EPIC has filed a Petitionwith the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the Court vacate an unlawful order by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that enables the collection of all domestic phone record by the NSA. The order, directed to Verizon, requires the production of all "call detail records" for calls made "wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls." EPIC said "It is simply not possible that every phone record in the possession of a telecommunications firm could be relevant to an authorized investigation. . . . Such an interpretation of [the law] would render meaningless the qualifying phrases contained in the provision and eviscerate the purpose of the Act." For more information, see In re Electronic Privacy Information Center. (Jul. 8, 2013)
New Guide for Judges in Expanding Area of International Arbitration-US Courts
A newguide on international commercial arbitration(pdf) written for U.S. federal judges is now available online. In less than 100 pages, it offers a practical overview of a complicated area of law that has become the preferred means of resolving cross-border business disputes.
Stacie Strong, a 2012-2013 Supreme Court Fellow working with the Federal Judicial Center, wrote the guide prior to beginning her fellowship year. Strong brought her unique background to the topic; she is not only a law professor at the University of Missouri, she also has practiced international commercial arbitration for a number of years in the U.S. and in England, and is dual-qualified as a U.S. lawyer and an English solicitor.
Snowden leak: Microsoft added Outlook.com backdoor for Feds • The Register
There are red faces in Redmond after Edward Snowden released a new batch of documents from the NSA's Special Source Operations (SSO) division covering Microsoft's involvement in allowing backdoor access to its software to the NSA and others.
Documents seen by The Guardian detail how the NSA became concerned when Microsoft started testing Outlook.com, and asked for access. In five months Microsoft and the FBI created a workaround that gives the NSA access to encrypted chats on Outlook.com. The system went live in December last year - two months before Outlook.com's commercial launch. Those Outlook users not enabling encryption get their data slurped as a matter of course, the documents show. "For Prism collection against Hotmail, Live, and Outlook.com emails will be unaffected because Prism collects this data prior to encryption," an NSA newsletter states.
Jeff Richardson: TranscriptPad imports the text versions of depositions provided by a court reporter and organizes them into cases. You can then use the app to read and annotate the deposition. And instead of simply marking all of the important stuff with a yellow highlighter (although you can do that too), TranscriptPad lets you add issue codes as you review a deposition. So if a Question and Answer are relevant to damages in a case, you can select those lines and apply the "Damages" issue code (or whatever other issue codes you want to create). When you are finished reviewing the deposition, the app creates a handy report organized by issue code so that you can, for example, see all of the key "Damages" testimony at one time, all of the key "Comparative Fault" testimony at one time, etc.
Ever since the app was first released, it has cost $49.99, but because Apple doesn't allow developers to charge for app updates, the developer told me that he is raising the price of the app to $89.99 to cover the future cost of development. I believe that the price increase will occur on Monday, July 29, 2013.
Accordingly, we hold that where, as here, an email [*15] message contains all material terms of a settlement and a manifestation of mutual accord, and the party to be charged, or his or her agent, types his or her name under circumstances manifesting an intent that the name be treated as a signature, such an email message may be deemed a subscribed writing within the meaning of CPLR 2104so as to constitute an enforceable agreement.
At the Strategic Solutions for Solo & Small Firms conference, Levitt and Rosch gave two presentations on advanced internet research (not just legal research, but lawyers obviously need to be able to research more than cases and statutes). Knowing how to do more than just type words into Google's search box -- as well as the kinds of information you can find for free online -- can be critical.
Jureeka 4.0 -- Powered by LII | LII / Legal Information Institute
JUREEKA 4.0 -- NOW POWERED BY LII
CREATED BY MICHAEL POULSHOCK. NOW POWERED BY LII.
Surf the legal web you didn't know was there! Working in your web browser, Jureeka simplifies online legal research by transforming plain-text legal citations into direct links to the source. Download Jureeka for Firefox
The brand new version 4.0 is now powered by the full collections of the Legal Information Institute and has been enhanced for optimal performance in Firefox.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA), or health care law, includes new health insurance coverage and financial assistance options, including the Premium Tax Credit, for individuals and families. The IRS will administer the tax provisions included in the law. Visit HealthCare.gov for more information on coverage options and assistance.
Town of Carmel v. Melchner, 105 A.D.3d 82 (2 Dept. 2/27/2013)
After a thorough analysis of the relevant case law, the appellate court determined that where the State owns the submerged land, it has exclusive jurisdiction over the navigable waters above it. As such, the State law preempts any municipal or local laws.
Judiciary to Remain Open If Government Shuts Down | United States Courts
In the event of a government shutdown on October 1, 2013, the federal Judiciary will remain open for business for approximately 10 business days. On or around October 15, 2013, the Judiciary will reassess its situation and provide further guidance. All proceedings and deadlines remain in effect as scheduled, unless otherwise advised. Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) will remain in operation for the electronic filing of documents with courts.
If rogue Republicans do not relent over the budget impasse by October 1, whatever pandemonium happens next will largely be governed by a federal statute you likely have never heard of: the Antideficiency Act. You can call it the "anti-deadbeat" law -- a collection of statutory and administrative provisions, really -- that forbid federal officials from entering into financial obligations for which they do not have funding, like paying the salaries of their employees or buying the things they need to run the government.
It's also the law that wisely permits certain "essential" government functions -- like the military and the courts, for example -- to keep operating even in the absence of authorized legislative funding.
Starting this month, all NYSBA members will receive free and unlimited access to the following libraries:
Decisions of N.Y. Court of Appeals, 1950-present;
A.D. Decisions, 1955-present;
Misc. Decisions, 1950-present;
N.Y. Consolidated Laws;
2d Cir. Decisions from 1924; and
U.S. Supreme Court Decisions.
Fastcase also offers a full subscription with access to other federal libraries and resources from all 50 states, which is typically available for a list price of $995 per year. Through this exclusive agreement, NYSBA members can subscribe to the full Fastcase library for only $195 per year - a discount of 80%. In addition, starting in October, new attorney members (those in their first two years of admission) will receive access to the full Fastcase library free of charge as a NYSBA member benefit.
In order to help you get the most from this new benefit, NYSBA will provide Fastcase training this fall, free of charge for NYSBA members. They will distribute details about Fastcase training in the coming weeks.
To sign up, visit NYSBA.org, log in to your NYSBA member account, and click the Fastcase banner at the top of our homepage or find it in the "pull-down menu" under "Members".
If you do not know your password please enter your email address at www.nysba.org/pwhelp. If you do not know the email address NYSBA has on file for you, please contact the State Bar Service Center at 800-582-2452 to get assistance logging in.
General Order 48 | Northern District of New York | United States District Court
Please be advised that the Court has issued General Order #48 In Re: Stay of Certain Civil Cases Pending the Restoration of Department of Justice Funding.
All civil cases (other than civil forfeiture cases) in which the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of New York has appeared as counsel for the United States, its agencies, and/or its employees are hereby stayed until the business day after the President signs into law a budget appropriation that restores Department of Justice funding.
State police issue 'field guide' for NY's gun law | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com
State Police has issued a field guide for its troopers and other law enforcement on how to handle New York's controversial gun-control law.
The 20-page guide, quietly issued last month and obtained by Gannett's Albany Bureau, notes that police officers have been concerned about enforcing the SAFE Act, which was championed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo and passed by the Legislature last January.
Darcy Wells, a spokesman from State Police, said field guides are often issued to assist police with new laws.
"We issue field guides on a routine basis, and in this case, because this is a new law, we had our counsel's office put together a guide not only for our members but others in law enforcement," Wells said in an email.
The SCOTUSblog iOS app is now available in the App Store for free download. In addition to mobile access to the regular content on the blog, users will be able to receive push notifications pertaining to breaking news at the Supreme Court. They promiset new features and improvements regularly.
As you may know, the Northern District has been deemed a congested court by the Judicial Conference Committee on Case Administration and Case Management. Over the past several years the Court, working closely with the Federal Court Bar Association, has been exploring ways to streamline the civil case resolution process. As a product of these discussions the Northern District of New York will be implementing a more robust Court annexed mediation program. The new Pilot Mandatory Mediation Program was fashioned after a similar program that was adopted in the Western District of New York several years ago. That program, along with several other paid mediation programs across the country, has shown great success in resolving cases at an early stage in the litigation process saving both time and money for the parties.
The Pilot Mandatory Mediation Program will run for two years starting with cases that are filed after January 1, 2014. Additionally, any civil case where a Rule 16 Conference has been scheduled after January 1, 2014 will be placed into the program. The Court and the Federal Court Bar Association felt strongly that the success of this program would hinge on the quality and expertise of the mediation panel. The Court, working closely with our ADR Committee and Federal Court Bar Association, selected highly qualified lawyers from across the district to participate as mediators in this new program. All of the selected mediators are required to attend an advanced mediation training seminar which focuses on federal mediation techniques.
As part of the new process, the parties will select the mediator of their choice from the Court approved list of mediators and complete a mandatory two-hour mediation session. The cost of the two-hour mandatory session will be capped at $300.00 ($150.00 per-hour, the $300.00 fee for the first two-hour session will be shared equally by the parties). Thereafter, the parties may agree to continue the mediation session beyond the mandatory two-hour period at the rate established for that mediator. During the pilot program, the Court has set a rate cap not to exceed $300.00 per-hour for those cases that proceed beyond the two-hour mandatory session. At the conclusion of the two-year pilot, the Court will evaluate the success of the program to determine if it should continue as a permanent part of our ADR suite. Attorneys participating in the program can expect to receive a short survey about their impressions of the new program. I ask your assistance in completing the survey so that we may properly assess the value of this program.
During the pendency of this Pilot program, the Court's current pro bono mediation, early neutral evaluation, and arbitration programs will be suspended. The Court will however, continue to operate the pro bono assisted mediation program which is designed to help pro se litigants proceed through court annexed mediation.
For more information on this new program, please refer to General Order #47 - Pilot Mandatory Mediation Program which is available on our Court Website under General Orders at www.nynd.uscourts.gov.
The complaint contains several legal theories: takings claims are brought under the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article 1, § 7 of the New York State Constitution. In addition, the complaint alleges that the State has imposed an illegal moratorium, has failed to comply with the provisions of SEQRA, has deprived landowners of rights with relief requested under 42 USC § 1983 and has violated substantive and procedural due process under the 14th Amendment. The complaint also seeks to compel the State to complete the SGEIS in a declaratory judgment action and Article 78 mandamus...
64 Federal Courts Now Publish Opinions on FDsys | United States Courts
A project providing free online access to federal court opinions has expanded to include 64 courts. The federal Judiciary and the Government Printing Office partner through the GPO's Federal Digital System, FDsys, to provide public access to more than 750,000 opinions, many dating back to 2004.
The Judicial Conference approved national implementation of the project in September 2012, expanding participation from the original 29 courts. FDsys currently contains opinions from 8 appellate courts, 20 district courts, and 35 bankruptcy courts.
Federal court opinions are one of the most heavily used collections on FDsys, with millions of retrievals each month. Opinions are pulled nightly from the courts' Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) systems and sent to the GPO, where they are posted on the FDsys website. Collections on FDsys are divided into appellate, district or bankruptcy court opinions and are text-searchable across courts. FDsys also allows embedded animation and audio - an innovation previously only available with opinions posted on a court's own website or on the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER).
While the public already can view federal court opinions for free on PACER, the FDSys project presents just another way to make court-related information more accessible to the public.
"Richard C" retroactive SNAP payments went out the weekend of Nov. 15th!--Empire Justice Center
In a recent settlement (Richard C. v. Proud), New York State has agreed to issue back benefits for those time periods when individuals were improperly sanctioned. The restored benefits will allow low income families to purchase much needed food for their families, especially during the holiday season, and will offset recent federal cuts to the SNAP program. As an added bonus, the 100% federally funded benefits will bring at least an additional $80 million in food expenditures to local economies.
November 14, 2013
The New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (OTDA) is issuing restored SNAP benefits to tens of thousands of households across New York State, in accordance with the "Richard C v Proud" class action court settlement.